Mind the carbon gap

“There are as many frameworks as there are disclosures” is a common phrase at ESG Book. It’s not without reason; the number of climate-related regulations and frameworks that companies and investors are expected to adhere to seems to grow by the day. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions data is essential for financial market participants to understand corporate alignment to various climate pathways, stress-test climate scenarios to identify transition risks and opportunities, and to engage with and hold companies accountable on their progress to meet their net zero targets.

To read the full article, click here.

 

Always check the label

Using ESG Book’s recently launched Fund ratings which are applied to over 4,000 ETFs and more than 32,000 mutual funds, we explore how marketing claims and the labelling of funds can be inconsistent with the actual data behind a fund’s investments. For this analysis, two groups of funds were selected. The first group contains any fund with ‘ESG’ in its name, and the second any fund with ‘climate’ within its name. These two groups contained 420 and 95 funds respectively, all of which have at least 68% market value coverage from ESG Book data.

To read the full article, click here.

Sustainable Finance Regulatory Update: September 2022 

World leaders and the private sector converged at Climate Week New York to discuss insights on finding growth in challenging times. In the policymaking world this month, governments resumed efforts to catalogue what constitutes a ‘good’ corporate citizen. Draft legislation in the EU is emphasizing supply chain due diligence with a focus on biodiversity and human rights. The ECB, in the same timeframe, introduced climate scores to underscore the importance of portfolio decarbonization. In a state of urgency, three ESAs submitted a final report with Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for disclosure of fossil gas and nuclear investment activity under SFDR. Switzerland’s asset management authority has provided guidelines which will be enshrined in a sustainability framework. Turning to the UK, corporates and investors alike noted patchwork policymaking in the region due to the delayed institution of a regulation enforcing human rights and environmental due diligence (HREDD). In contrast to the HREDD focus, the US is putting a spotlight on the governance pillar of ESG. The S.E.C. has baked ‘pay versus performance’ disclosures into listing requirements. Over in China, the government has released a ‘Plan’ which will establish a system to standardize emissions accounting methods. Further south, Australia is doubling down on its net zero commitments with the passing of an historic climate bill. The country is also reviewing the Modern Slavery Act and has encouraged the public, particularly businesses, to submit feedback. Despite the multitude and variance of policies across countries, sustainability has become the mainstay of prominent multilateral agreements. The upcoming COP27 will set the stage for state actors to deepen cooperation and collaboration.
Europe 
The European Commission presents ban on products made with forced labor in the EU market 
On September 14, 2022, the European Commission published its proposal for a Regulation introducing a ban on placing and making available products made with forced labor on the EU market. The regulation would require Member States to appoint a competent authority to review value chain risk assessment of economic operators. The degree of risk-based enforcement will vary depending on the size of the company. SMEs will be exempted from a threshold clause in the regulation that warrants forced labor investigations. Access the proposal here.
The European Parliament has requested that banks conduct due diligence to prevent their involvement in projects linked to deforestation 
MEPs voted in favor of strengthening proposals for a regulation to prevent the import of products produced in deforested areas. The draft law will expand the definition of “forests” to include “wooded land”, initially targeting six commodities that are historically linked to deforestation and human rights abuses – soy, beef, palm oil, timber, cacao and coffee. On the due diligence side, companies must verify compliance with global standards for human rights and uphold the rights of indigenous peoples. Conservation experts, though largely supportive of the new bill, argue that other ecosystems such as wetlands and drylands should be in scope of the EU Deforestation Law. Read more.
ESAs propose disclosure requirements for taxonomy-aligned fossil fuel and nuclear activity 
Three European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) have proposed enhanced disclosure requirements for financial products investing in nuclear energy and fossil gas. The final report with RTS seeks to provide transparency to investors by assessing a financial product’s level of involvement in fossil gas and nuclear energy. These disclosures are aligned with the Complementary Climate Delegated Act and are complementary to existing disclosures under SFDR for nuclear and fossil gas activities. The European Commission will fast-track review of the draft RTS disclosure requirements and decide on the applicability date of the final version. Read more.
AMAS publishes guidance for implementing ESG framework  
The Asset Management Association of Switzerland (AMAS) is advocating self-regulation for sustainable portfolio management by introducing a new ESG framework. Retail investors and asset managers of Swiss collective investment schemes choosing to adopt the framework will have to report specified governance metrics and institute an organizational process to meet disclosure obligations. In addition to compliance with ESG rules, executives and other employees must demonstrate competency in sustainability risk management. Read more.
ECB introduces climate scores for portfolio management 
The European Central Bank (ECB) has introduced climate scores following an announcement to integrate climate action into its monetary policy. Climate scores are intended to help decarbonize more than 380bn euros of corporate bond holding on a long-term basis. The ECB will exclude securities with a high-level of exposure to climate-related risks and support the sale of bonds by issuers with a strong climate performance. To determine the overall rating, the regulator will assign a score based on backwards-looking emissions (Scope 1 and 2 at the issuer level), emissions modeling (at the sectoral level) and disclosure quality. Read more.
United Kingdom 
Businesses and investors lobby to support due diligence mandate  
The UK’s departure from the European Union is reflected in ESG policy misalignment and this can only be remedied with timely government intervention. More than 40 companies, investors and business associations have expressed concerns about policy gaps between the UK and the EU by issuing a joint statement in support of regulation enforcing environmental and human rights due diligence obligations. Business groups have previously also highlighted the necessity of a ‘Business, Human Rights and Environment Act’ in line with EU laws. Read more.
Americas
US Securities and Exchange Commission issues ‘pay versus performance’ rules 
Listed companies will now have to disclose how top management’s pay relates to performance and can supplement this information with metrics that relate to environmental, social and governance factors. An overview of compensation must be reported in a summary table with principle executive officer’s pay and average executive pay over the last five fiscal years (three years for small companies). The S.E.C. rule has also specified indicators of financial performance to include total shareholder returns and net income. Read more.
Asia pacific 
China Issues a Plan to Establish a Carbon Emission Statistical Accounting System  
China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have jointly developed the “Implementation Plan on the Accelerating the Establishment of a Unified and Standardised Carbon Emission Statistical Accounting System. The System is designed to improve the quality and comparability of carbon emissions data at the national and local level. Read more.
Australia passes landmark climate bill to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 
In a notable shift from Australia’s conservative approach to climate policy, the Parliament voted to raise emissions reduction targets to a level 50% higher than under the previous government. The newly introduced bill further requires the government’s clean financing and energy infrastructure bodies to incorporate the emissions reduction targets in the overall operations strategy. Australia’s Green Party and Labor are also set to draft supplementary legislation providing for a “safeguard mechanism” that punishes the country’s biggest industrial polluters. Read more.
Review of Australia’s Modern Slavery Act 
The Australian Government is seeking feedback from the public on the implementation of the Modern Slavery Act (MSA) over the past three years. MSA is applicable to all entities owned and operated in Australia with over A$100 total revenue. The regulation sets forth disclosure requirements for identifying and managing the risk of modern slavery in the supply chain on annual basis. As it currently stands, the law does not impose penalties on companies that fail to comply. In its final review, the Government may incorporate recommendations from interested stakeholders, including business, on how to enhance the law. Read more.
Other News & Resources 
  • NGOs walk out on the EU Taxonomy: five environmental and consumer organizations have left the EU advisory group Platform on Sustainable Finance because, they say, the European Commission had “interfered politically” in the platform’s work. Read more.
  • IOSCO Report: Education on sustainable finance helps protect investors against fraud and greenwashing. Access the report here.  
  • Singapore’s MAS releases Industry Transformation Map 2025: The plan will help guide financial market participants through the transition to a net zero economy. Read more.
  • GRI to update 2021 framework: GRI will integrate human rights reporting in the framework’s labor Topic Standards. Read more.
  • UK Green Taxonomy in discussion: The All-Party Parliamentary Group on ESG (APPG) held a high-level discussion on Green Taxonomy in anticipation of legislation later this year. The group will publish a GT report based on the internal discussion which will cover topics such as greenwashing and tools for sustainable investing. Read more.

Uncharted waters

Water is a crucial part of Earth’s climate system and, as a result, is intrinsically linked to climate change. While water is a victim of climate change, the way we manage and use water can contribute to it. Climate change affects the availability, quality and quantity of water required to meet basic human needs and threatens our human right to access clean water and sanitation. Water-related risks are becoming more immediate and significant, potentially adversely affecting all water users across the globe¹. On the other hand, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in water supply, treatment and desalination can be significant contributors to global warming.

Water is input to almost all production activities. While specific sectors have unique KPIs, dependency on water is universal. In this landscape, water-resilient investments will be vital, and water data will be necessary for decision-making. Water is an important area for impact investors because water delivers a positive, clear, measurable impact – the trade-off between the benefits and sustainability of water is unambiguous². Water extraction, consumption and discharge are all closely interlinked, and good practice will have a positive chain effect.

Despite its importance, water reporting lags behind carbon reporting with information deficit and disclosure insufficiency. Many companies are still new and ineffective in water management and reporting³. The proprietary ESG Book dataset shows that even the most frequently disclosed metric for water (Quantitative Water Data Disclosure) has a coverage of only 54.91% in 2020, lower than the 65.11% coverage for Scope 3 GHG emissions (Figure 1). Moreover, the carbon reporting paradigm may not apply to water reporting due to water’s multifaceted, unidirectional, and localised nature. Unlike carbon, which can transport and accumulate worldwide, water issues are confined to certain times and geographical areas.

To read the full article, click here.

What’s your fund’s ESG strategy?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed changes to the ‘Investment Company Act,’ an umbrella fund labeling regulation that requires 80% of holdings to be invested in accordance with the fund’s suggested investment focus. Funds that deem themselves ‘ESG,’ ‘sustainable’ or ‘green’ would be required, under the ‘modernized’ regulation, to identify securities included in the 80% basket. The proposed rule seeks to enhance data comparability and help investors differentiate between investment strategies. Given the investment industry’s demand for quantitative data, the S.E.C. has also introduced a standardized methodology for reporting emissions metrics. The fund labeling rule will be opened for comment and subject to further amendments. If finalized, it would be enforced at the start of the upcoming fiscal year FY 2023. In its proposal, the S.E.C. notes the rapid expansion of the sustainable investment universe – a 25 times increase from $639 billion to $17.1 trillion. The regulator is presently undertaking multiple measures to protect investors from misleading or exaggerated ESG claims, including the recent climate disclosure rule. The S.E.C. is, however, facing backlash for extending its powers. Several republican treasurers are punishing big banks including Wells Fargo, JP Morgan, and Goldman Sachs for fossil fuel divestment and preventing them from obtaining government contracts. The governing landscape is undergoing a paradigm shift in the U.S. and progressive rulemaking is being blocked beyond the treasury in republican-led state legislatures.

To read the full article, click here.

One Draft at a Time

In an increasingly complex reporting landscape, firms are faced with an overabundance of frameworks and standards against which they can report their sustainability credentials. As stakeholders progressively highlight the need for consistent and comparable data1, standard-setting bodies are taking note. Public consultations for the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) General Sustainability and Climate exposure drafts (IFRS S1 and S2), and the European Financial Advisory Group (EFRAG) Draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) were both live in Q2, 2022. The introduction of two draft standards with a potentially wide reach signals a trend towards the standardization of ESG reporting across jurisdictions.

To read the full article, click here.

Fifty shades of green

Europe’s landmark anti-greenwashing rulebook for the investment industry, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) has triggered a growing number of investment funds to self-classify as either Article 6, Article 8, or Article 9. Since its implementation in March 2021, every financial market participant operating in the EU must disclose the extent to which their entity and investment products are aligned with the SFDR sustainable investment objectives (Article 6, 8 or 9 funds).

To read the full article, click here.

Sustainable Finance Regulatory Update: August 2022

Policymakers are continuing to develop a comprehensive mechanism for investigating funds that label themselves as ‘ESG.’ A new chapter also begins in the ratings industry as regulators are pushing for long anticipated oversight and accountability. The long-awaited Social Taxonomy in Europe has been put on hold as regulators question the complexity of implementation. In Germany, regulators will now require risk analysis for supply chain due diligence. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK are independently evaluating the quality of TCFD climate disclosures. Across the Pond, U.S. President Biden has approved a landmark bill providing funding for climate and energy innovation over the next decade. In Australia, the financial services authority has issued new guidelines to help investors assess the level of preparedness in managing climate risk. Also in Asia Pacific, Japan has unveiled the world’s first code of conduct for ESG data providers. Turning to emerging markets, Nigeria’s securities exchange is taking stock of climate risk management by preparing disclosure guidelines. Countries around the world are building momentum around climate change policy by monitoring evolving threats in a local context. Global standards are not likely to be adopted by governments wholesale but may help shed some light on reporting best practices.

 
Europe 
The European Social Taxonomy postponed indefinitely 
According to sources, the EU Social Taxonomy has been postponed indefinitely due to difficulties in arriving to a common conceptual framework that would work at both the EU and global level. The EU’s Platform on Sustainable Finance published a set of proposals for the social taxonomy in February 2022, after a four-month delay from the original schedule. The list includes guidelines on pay, gender equality and sustainable supply chain practices. The recommendations did little to accelerate the process, leading up to a political stalemate. The implications for firms and investors who were looking to work with a well-defined set of ‘Social’ criteria could be significant. Read more. 

Germany’s Economic Affairs Department provides guidance to support compliance with a due diligence law 
BAFA (Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle) has issued guidance for companies required to conduct risk analysis under the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (SCDDA). The law requires companies to assess environment and human rights characteristics across the supply chain on an annual basis. Companies may also produce ad hoc risk reports in circumstances where there are substantiated findings or operational changes. The purpose of risk management is to help companies implement ‘appropriate’ measures to rectify negative outcomes and business impact. Read more.

 
United Kingdom 
UK’s FCA and FRC review the quality of premium listed companies’ climate disclosures 
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Financial Review Council (FRC) have independently conducted high-level analyses of TCFD aligned disclosures from premium listed companies. The reports acknowledge an uptick in climate disclosures from 2020, following the implementation of ‘comply or explain’ listing requirements since January 1, 2021. Report findings show steadily improving quality of disclosures with 90% reliability rate for governance-related metrics. However, a review of quantitative data such as scenario analysis shows that companies are having issues with TCFD recommended materiality assessment. For future disclosures, FCA and FRC recommend furnishing granular data such as climate change data across the supply chain and on a sectoral level in accordance with TCFD’s four themes. Read more. 

Americas   
Biden signs landmark US climate and energy investment bill, aiming to cut GHGs 
US President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act on Aug. 16, providing for $370 billion in energy security and climate change spending over the next ten years. The legislation has the intention of spurring innovation in clean energy and transportation manufacturing and driving down greenhouse gas emissions. Read more.

Asia pacific 
Australia’s Financial Services Council issues climate disclosure standards for asset owners 
Australia’s financial services authority has issued new guidelines establishing ‘common baseline expectations’ for the disclosure of climate-friendly investment by investment managers. The voluntary guidelines support the management of climate risk and illuminate the investment management industry’s path to achieving net-zero commitments. Read more.  

Japan compiles code of conduct for ESG data providers 
Japan’s Financial Services Authority has become the first national regulator to prepare a code of conduct for ESG data providers. A voluntary set of guidelines provides the framework for building technical skills and competencies across the industry. The draft code is also a direct response to a report questioning the legitimacy of ESG ratings and other data published by the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in 2021. The code of conduct contains 6 pillars to improve the quality and transparency of data. It encourages all organizations providing ESG data in Japan to signal the robustness of evaluation and proprietary data. Read more.

Africa and middle east  
Nigeria’s stock market regulator to issue new climate disclosure guidelines 
Nigeria’s top stock exchanges will release the first set of climate disclosure guidelines to complement existing sustainability disclosure guidelines. The forthcoming guidelines will borrow from TCFD and contain best reporting practices in compliance with global standards such as GRI. A voluntary regulation will help key actors across the investment chain navigate the ESG landscape, however, the regulator is hoping the government will set mandatory ESG and climate reporting requirements. This will help create ‘deliberate partnerships’ between public and private stakeholders in Nigeria. Read more. 

Other News & Resources 

  • Call for feedback on Minimum Social Safeguards criteria: Open until 6 September 2022. The Platform on Sustainable Finance seeks public feedback on its draft report on minimum safeguards. The minimum safeguards set out in Article 18 of the Taxonomy Regulation require that companies implement procedures to comply with OECD Guidelines for multinational enterprises and the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. The report on minimum safeguards aims to provide advice on how compliance with minimum safeguards could be assessed. The Platform’s advice will feed into Commission work on the usability of the EU taxonomy. Read more. 
  • Eurosif Survey on Climate Data & Indicators: With its survey Eurosif wants to better understand which climate-related information are truly decision-useful for investors. The survey will be open until 7 October 2022. Read more. 

ESG Quick Takes 7: US Climate and Energy Policy is behind

What does the inflation reduction act mean for business and investors and how does it impact the energy transition?

We are talking to Samantha Gross who is a fellow and director of the Energy Security and Climate Initiative at The Brookings Institution. Her work is focused on the intersection of energy, environment, and policy. Gross has more than 20 years of experience in energy and environmental affairs. She was director of the Office of International Climate and Clean Energy at the U.S. Department of Energy. Before that, Gross was director of integrated research at IHS CERA. She has also worked at the Government Accountability Office on the Natural Resources and Environment team and as an engineer, directing environmental assessment and remediation projects. Gross holds a Bachelor of Science in chemical engineering from the University of Illinois, a Master of Science in environmental engineering from Stanford, and a Master of Business Administration from the University of California at Berkeley. Follow her on Twitter for more, and see her latest article on the Inflation Reduction Act here.

DISCLAIMER

ESG Book, registered with Companies House under Company No. FC035689 and UK establishment no. BR020774, and with registered office at Fifth Floor, Jamestown Wharf, 32 Jamestown Road London, NW1 7BY, is the UK branch of ESG Book GmbH, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Germany, with registered number HRB 113087 in the commercial register of the court of Frankfurt am Main, and having its seat and head office at Zeppelinallee 15, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

PROFESSIONAL ADVICE – This podcast is provided for general information purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. If professional advice is required, services of a competent professional should be sought. THIRD PARTY INFORMATION – Certain information contained in this document has been obtained from sources outside ESG Book. While such information is believed to be reliable for the purposes used herein, no representations are made as to the accuracy or completeness thereof and none of ESG Book or its affiliates accepts any responsibility for such information. RELIANCE – ESG Book makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and accepts no liability for any loss, of whatever kind, howsoever arising, in relation thereto, and nothing contained herein should be relied upon. VIEWS EXPRESSED – Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the speaker, and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of ESG Book. ENQUIRIES – Any enquiries in respect of this podcast should be addressed to ESG Book or its affiliates.

ESG Quick Takes 6: Investing on a Net-Zero Emissions Budget is Impossible

As a growing number of investors have Net Zero targets, the question comes up: what does a Net Zero pathway look like?

We are talking to climate scenario wizard Sven Teske, who researches energy decarbonisation pathways at the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney. Most recently, Sven Teske led the work on the One Earth Climate Model (OECM) commissioned by the UN-convened Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance and the European Climate Foundation. In this episode, he presents a clear picture of what decarbonizing the world looks like, and puts this ambition in context with actual developments, such as the recent US Supreme Court’s decision to curb the power of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

DISCLAIMER

ESG Book is the trading name of Arabesque S-Ray GmbH, UK Branch. Arabesque S-Ray GmbH, UK Branch, registered with Companies House under Company No. FC035689 and UK establishment no. BR020774, and with registered office at Fifth Floor, Jamestown Wharf, 32 Jamestown Road London, NW1 7BY, is the UK branch of Arabesque S-Ray GmbH, a limited liability company organized under the laws of Germany, with registered number HRB 113087 in the commercial register of the court of Frankfurt am Main, and having its seat and head office at Zeppelinallee 15, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

PROFESSIONAL ADVICE – This podcast is provided for general information purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. If professional advice is required, services of a competent professional should be sought. THIRD PARTY INFORMATION – Certain information contained in this document has been obtained from sources outside ESG Book. While such information is believed to be reliable for the purposes used herein, no representations are made as to the accuracy or completeness thereof and none of ESG Book or its affiliates accepts any responsibility for such information. RELIANCE – ESG Book makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and accepts no liability for any loss, of whatever kind, howsoever arising, in relation thereto, and nothing contained herein should be relied upon. VIEWS EXPRESSED – Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the speaker, and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of ESG Book. ENQUIRIES – Any enquiries in respect of this podcast should be addressed to ESG Book or its affiliates.